Header image alt text

karatekidwallpapers.com

GREER, South Carolina (Reuters) ? Republican front-runner Mitt Romney defended his leadership on Thursday of a private equity firm at the center of a raging campaign battle in South Carolina over whether while its chief executive he was a job killer.

Romney is facing attack ads from rival Newt Gingrich in South Carolina over his tenure at Bain Capital, a private equity outfit that bought and restructured companies, sometimes resulting in the loss of jobs.

The objective of Gingrich along with a fellow conservative candidate, Rick Perry, is to try to stop Romney’s momentum toward the 2012 Republican presidential nomination after his victories in Iowa and New Hampshire.

A victory in South Carolina on January 21 would put Romney well on his way to the nomination.

At a motorcycle dealership in Greer, South Carolina, Romney staged a news conference after a campaign event to address the issue. He said Bain helped start four companies, Staples, Bright Horizons Children’s Centers, Sports Authority and Steel Dynamics that had created well over 100,000 jobs.

“A few thousand jobs” were lost from failing enterprises, he said.

“The reality is in the private sector there are some businesses that are growing and thriving and we were fortunate enough to be part of that in a small way, and there are some businesses that have to be cut back in order to survive and try to make them stronger.”

“And sometimes you’re successful with that and sometimes you’re not,” he said.

The Bain charges, if they stick, could damage Romney’s ability to sell himself as a former executive with more experience in creating jobs than his Republican rivals or than Democratic President Barack Obama, whom he hopes to challenge for the White House this November.

“I think people want to see a hands-on. ‘get-the-job-done’ leader and I’ve demonstrated that,” he said.

Bain is only one potential minefield for Romney as he seeks to make it three wins in a row in South Carolina — and as his conservative rivals try to stop him.

Another problem for Romney is his stand on abortion. He is facing criticism of changing his position from in favor of a woman’s right to choose whether to have an abortion to opposing the procedure.

To stress that point, Romney made a point of mentioning his desire to preserve “life” three times in his speech to a crowd at the motorcycle shop.

“I understand that there are some attack ads coming my way that question that, and obviously it’s important for me to remind people that I’m pro-life,” he told reporters later.

(Editing by Philip Barbara)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/gop/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20120112/ts_nm/us_usa_campaign_romney

joplin mo snakes bath salts 2012 calendar dolls ord celebrity apprentice winner

DES MOINES, Iowa ? As their rivals look for support among Iowa caucusgoers, Mitt Romney focused on early voting South Carolina and Newt Gingrich stayed close to home in Washington with a little more than two weeks before this state starts the winnowing of the Republicans’ presidential hopefuls.

Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry both continued bus tours through rural Iowa, while Rick Santorum continued an all-in strategy that has won him the honor of spending the most time in the state yet has not yet translated that into support in polls. Ron Paul, who has a loyal following among his party’s libertarian wing, continued to build momentum and organization here; he does not have public events scheduled until midweek, though.

Ahead of Jan. 3′s lead-off contests, caucusgoers remain incredibly undecided and most candidates are redoubling efforts before voters largely tune out the race for the week between Christmas and New Year. Televisions in Iowa are already laden with political advertising and the final weeks of the campaign are expected to escalate their frequency.

Gingrich, who faces the toughest criticism on the airwaves, planned a conference call with reporters on Saturday and then an appearance on CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday. As caucus day comes closer, the former House speaker’s decision to effectively take the weekend off raised eyebrows given his rivals’ busy schedules to meet as many voters in this state as possible.

Gingrich has prided himself on a nontraditional campaign, but his advantages in the polls could shift if the only exposure to Gingrich comes through rivals’ negative ads. Paul last week released an ad accusing Gingrich of “serial hypocrisy” and Bachmann opened her bus tour on Friday suggesting that he was arrogant during this week’s final debate before the caucuses.

“I thought that it was outrageous and insulting, the way that he seemed to treat me like I was a student, and I’m not,” she told CNN. “I’m a serious candidate for president of the United States.”

Romney, a former Massachusetts governor who has kept Iowa at arm’s length after investing heavily here four years ago only to come up short, planned town hall-style meetings in Charleston, S.C., and Myrtle Beach, S.C. Even so, his advisers note they have kept in touch with supporters of his 2008 campaign that came in second place in Iowa.

Meanwhile, both Bachmann’s and Perry’s bus tours continued to roll along, often visiting the same places days apart. Both are hoping to remind caucusgoers why they liked them during the summer. Each enjoyed a meteoric rise ? followed by a precipitous fall.

And Santorum, who earlier this year completed his own bus tour of Iowa’s 99 counties, continued to press forward with his deeply conservative message. Although he badly trails in the polls, he is hoping his work courting Christian conservatives pays off the way it did four years ago for former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, who early on decided against competing in Iowa, planned a town hall-style meeting in New Hampshire. Huntsman, who also served as President Barack Obama’s ambassador to China, has kept his focus on New Hampshire, where independent voters are the largest bloc and can vote in either party’s primary.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/politics/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111217/ap_on_el_pr/us_gop_campaign

wicked glee finale mandala dallas weather buffalo news wendy williams sara evans

More Americans say the economy got better in the past month than say it got worse, according to an AP-GFK poll.

More Americans say the economy got better in the past month than say it got worse, according to an AP-GFK poll.

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Entering 2012, President Barack Obama’s re-election prospects are essentially a 50-50 proposition, with a majority saying the president deserves to be voted out of office despite concerns about the Republican alternatives, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll.

Obama’s overall poll numbers suggest he’s in jeopardy of losing, even as the public’s outlook on the economy appears to be improving, the AP-GfK poll found. For the first time since spring, more said the economy got better in the past month than said it got worse.

The president’s approval rating on unemployment shifted upward ? from 40 percent in October to 45 percent in the latest poll ? as the jobless rate fell to 8.6 percent last month, its lowest level since March 2009.

But Obama’s approval rating on his handling of the economy overall remains stagnant: 39 percent approve and 60 percent disapprove.

Heading into his re-election campaign, the president faces a conflicted public that does not support his steering of the economy, the most dominant issue for Americans, or his reforms to health care, one of his signature accomplishments. Yet they are grappling with whether to replace him with Republican contenders Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich.

The poll found an even divide on whether Americans expect Obama to be re-elected next year.

For the first time, the poll found that a majority of adults, 52 percent, said Obama should be voted out of office while 43 percent said he deserves another term. The numbers mark a reversal since last May, when 53 percent said Obama should be re-elected while 43 percent said he didn’t deserve four more years.

Obama’s overall job approval stands at a new low: 44 percent approve while 54 percent disapprove. The president’s standing among independents is worse: 38 percent approve while 59 percent disapprove. Among Democrats, the president holds steady with an approval rating of 78 percent while only 12 percent of Republicans approve of the job he’s doing.

“I think he’s doing the best he can. The problem is the Congress won’t help at all,” said Rosario Navarro, a Democrat and a 44-year-old truck driver from Fresno, Calif., who voted for Obama in 2008 and intends to support him again.

Robin Dein, a 54-year-old homemaker from Villanova, Pa., who is an independent, said she supported Republican John McCain in 2008 and has not been impressed with Obama’s economic policies. She intends to support Romney if he wins the GOP nomination.

“(Obama) spent the first part of his presidency blaming Bush for everything, not that he was innocent, and now his way of solving anything is by spending more money,” she said.

Despite the soft level of support, many are uncertain whether a Republican president would be a better choice. Asked whom they would support next November, 47 percent of adults favored Obama compared with 46 percent for Romney, a former Massachusetts governor. Against Gingrich, the president holds a solid advantage, receiving 51 percent compared with 42 percent for the former House speaker.

The potential matchups paint a better picture for the president among independents. Obama receives 45 percent of non-aligned adults compared with 41 percent for Romney. Against Gingrich, Obama holds a wide lead among independents, with 54 percent supporting the president and 31 percent backing the former Georgia congressman.

Another piece of good news for Obama: people generally like him personally. Obama’s personal favorability rating held steady at 53 percent, with 46 percent viewing him unfavorably. About three-quarters called him likable.

The economy remains a source of pessimism, though the poll suggests the first positive movement in public opinion on the economy in months. One in five said the economy improved in the last month, double the share saying so in October. Still most expect it to stay the same or get worse.

“I suppose you could make some sort of argument that it’s getting better, but I’m not sure I even see that,” said independent voter John Bailey, a 61-year-old education consultant from East Jordan, Mich. “I think it’s bad and it’s gotten worse under (Obama’s) policies. At best, it’s going to stay bad.”

Despite the high rate of joblessness, the poll found some optimism on the economy. Although 80 percent described the economy as “poor,” respondents describing it “very poor” fell from 43 percent in October to 34 percent in the latest poll, the lowest since May. Twenty percent said the economy got better in the past month while 37 percent said they expected the economy to improve next year.

Yet plenty of warning signs remain for Obama. Only 26 percent said the United States is headed in the right direction while 70 percent said the country was moving in the wrong direction.

The president won a substantial number of women voters in 2008 yet there does not appear to be a significant tilt toward Obama among women now. The poll found 44 percent of women say Obama deserves a second term, down from 51 percent in October, while 43 percent of men say the president should be re-elected.

About two-thirds of white voters without college degrees say Obama should be a one-term president, while 33 percent of those voters say he should get another four years. Among white voters with a college degree, 57 percent said Obama should be voted out of office.

The poll found unpopularity for last year’s health care reform bill, one of Obama’s major accomplishments. About half of the respondents oppose the health care law and support for it dipped to 29 percent from 36 percent in June. Just 15 percent said the federal government should have the power to require all Americans to buy health insurance.

Even among Democrats, the health care law has tepid support. Fifty percent of Democrats supported the health care law, compared with 59 percent of Democrats last June. Only about a quarter of independents back the law.

The president has taken a more populist tone in his handling of the economy, arguing that the wealthy should pay more in taxes to help pay for the extension of a payroll tax cut that would provide about $1,000 in tax cuts to a family earning about $50,000 a year. Among those with annual household incomes of $50,000 or less, Obama’s approval rating on unemployment climbed to 53 percent, from 43 percent in October.

The Associated Press-GfK Poll was conducted December 8-12 2011 by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved landline and cellphone interviews with 1,000 adults nationwide and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

___

Associated Press writer Stacy A. Anderson and News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius contributed to this report.

___

Online: www.ap-gfkpoll.com

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2011-12-16-Obama-Poll/id-c384b2c760f143b5b8010de7f545e424

macho man randy savage blockbuster doomsday may 21st end of the world may 21 world time zone map meme

SIOUX CITY, Iowa ? Newt Gingrich says he’s trying to edit himself so he doesn’t come across as “zany.”

Gingrich’s remarks at the Republican debate Thursday night were aimed at rival Mitt Romney, who in an interview on Wednesday used the word “zany” to describe the former House speaker.

Gingrich smiled when he was asked a question about how he would counsel Republicans on the political controversy over construction of a new pipeline from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.

Gingrich said that at times he is accused of using language that is too strong and so he was “editing” himself. He then quipped that he’s very concerned about not appearing to be “zany.”

Romney has stepped up attacks on Gingrich’s temperament as Gingrich has vaulted to the top of the GOP field.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/gop/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111216/ap_on_el_pr/us_gop_debate_gingrich_zany

scientology magic johnson bad teacher jane lynch nba finals konami wsop

ANALYSIS | Newt Gingrich, the GOP frontrunner heading into the Iowa caucus, is losing his lead in Iowa, and fellow candidate Ron Paul is closing in behind him, the AFP Tuesday reported. Voters might be realizing what PolitiFact already knows: Paul tells the truth more than twice as often as Gingrich.

PolitiFact, an independent, nonpartisan fact-checking website, is owned and run by the Poynter Institute, a non-profit school for journalism. As the Iowa caucus nears, Gingrich’s record on truth might be hurting him. PolitiFact rated nearly 60 percent of Gingrich’s statements as Mostly False, False or Pants on Fire, a designation it saves for truly ridiculous claims. Ron Paul’s number, 36 percent, is much smaller.

Gingrich earned the smoking trousers for 18 percent of statements rated by PolitiFact, compared to just 7 percent for Paul. Broadly speaking, this means that Gingrich is wrong on six out of every ten claims he makes, and he’s telling a whopper once in five.

Here’s how the numbers break down for Newt Gingrich versus Ron Paul. The statistics were collected on the evening of Dec. 13, but may change if PolitiFact adds a new claim.

Newt Gingrich – wrong nearly 60 percent of the time

PolitiFact analyzed 33 statements made by Newt Gingrich.

  • True or Mostly True: 6 out of 33, or 18 percent
  • Half-true: 8 out of 33, or 24 percent
  • Mostly False, False, Pants on Fire: 19, or 58 percent
  • Pants on Fire: 6 out of 33, or 18 percent

Ron Paul – More truthful, less fire in pants

PolitiFact analyzed 28 statements made by Ron Paul.

  • True or Mostly True: 14 out of 28, or 50 percent
  • Half-true: 4 out of 28, or 14 percent
  • Mostly False, False, Pants on Fire: 10 out of 28, or 36 percent
  • Pants on Fire: 2 out of 28, or 7 percent

Well, yeah, but what about Obama?

PolitiFact analyzed 330 statements made by Barack Obama.

  • True or Mostly True: 154 out of 330, or 47 percent
  • Half-true: 79 out of 330, or 24 percent
  • Mostly False, False, Pants on Fire: 97 out of 330, or 29 percent
  • Pants on Fire: 4 out of 330, or one-tenth of one percent (0.1 percent)

So what does it all mean?

Voters who want a truthful GOP candidate should choose Ron Paul over Newt Gingrich. Mitt Romney ties Paul for getting it wrong, but Paul trumps Romney 50 percent to 40 percent for getting things right.

Voters interested in truthfulness and accuracy regardless of party affiliation should choose Obama instead. Obama is neck-and-neck with Paul for getting things right (47 percent vs. 50 percent, a statistical tie given the sample sizes), but where Obama really shines is in not getting things wrong. Paul is wrong 36 percent of the time, compared to 29 percent for Obama, and Paul tells a whopper 7 percent of the time compared to less than one percent for Obama.

Is there anyone less truthful than Gingrich?

Yes. Michele Bachmann gets it wrong or mostly wrong 73 percent of the time. Glenn Beck is at 65 percent, and Rush Limbaugh comes in at 77 percent.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/gop/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20111214/pl_ac/10678381_gingrich_losing_lead_in_iowa_ron_paul_more_truthful

aca cerebral palsy hiv the temptations aardvark eve online klm

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics – Top Stories Stories, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/165581611?client_source=feed&format=rss

ecards free ecards boxing news atlantis boxing ellie goulding lakers vs mavericks

Gingrich (Evan Vucci/AP)

Newt Gingrich, the latest frontrunner in the 2012 GOP presidential field has wasted little time in testing his appeal for the party’s social conservative base, with comments in Tuesday night’s CNN debate in favor of a more “humane” approach to enforcing immigration law. In the forum–a national-security debate that the cable network cosponsored with conservative think tanks Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute–Gingrich argued to extend the basic protections of citizenship to the families of otherwise law-abiding illegal immigrants.

“I don’t see how the party that says it’s the party of the family, is going to adopt an immigration policy which destroys families that have been here a quarter century,” the former House Speaker said. “And I’m prepared to take the heat for saying ‘let’s be humane and enforce the law without giving them citizenship but by finding a way to create legality so they are not separate from their families.’” You can watch Gingrich’s comments in the CNN clip below:

Gingrich?who advocates the Vernon K. Krieble Foundation’s immigration proposal to create “red card” work permits– said he does support deporting recent illegal immigrants. But he did disown a hardline policy of seeking out and punishing children of illegal immigrants, including those who wish to serve in the U.S. military. As rival candidate Michele Bachmann was quick to point out, Gingrich’s position shares many affinities with the DREAM Act proposal defeated in Congress last year. And Bachmann, together with other conservative candidates on the dais, called out Gingrich for backing a version of amnesty for the families of people who entered the United States illegally.

“I don’t agree that you would make 11 million [illegal] workers [in this country] legal,” Bachmann said. “Because that in effect is amnesty. And I also don’t agree that you would give the DREAM Act on a federal level.”

In a follow-up exchange on the issue, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said he agreed with Gingrich that illegal immigrants with masters degrees should be encouraged to remain in this country via green cards. But Romney also stressed that he agreed with moderater Wolf Blitzer’s suggestion that Gingrich’s policies would entice more illegal immigrants to come to America.

“There’s no question,” Romney said. “That will only encourage more people to do the same thing. People respond to incentives, and if you can become a permanent resident of the United States by coming here illegally, you’ll do so.”

Five minutes after the debate ended, Bachmann’s campaign issued a press release entitled “Newt Gingrich’s Open Door to Illegal Immigrant Amnesty.” The Bachmann camp listed Gingrich’s past statements in support of the enforcement policy he outlined tonight.

Gingrich, a staunch conservative, has long backed creating paths for otherwise law-abiding illegal immigrants to work in America–but Tuesday’s comments are likely to make significant waves now that he’s atop the presidential polls.

The fledgling 2012 campaign has already seen one early frontrunner stumble on the thorny immigration question. In September, Texas Gov. Rick Perry–who had enjoyed a strong initial run in the polls after he announced his presidential candidacy–tried to make a similar case for a less hardline immigration policy during a debate in Orlando, Fla.

In that forum, Perry stated that opponents of a Texas policy permitting in-state tuition for the children of illegal immigrants “don’t have a heart.”

After conservatives assailed Perry for that comment, he backpedaled, saying that his choice of words hadn’t been sound.

Former Washington Post reporter Jose Antonio Vargas, who revealed in a June story for the New York Times that he was an undocumented illegal immigrant, offered praise for Gingrich immediately following the forum.

“Both sides need to elevate the conversation about immigration, and that is why I applaud Newt Gingrich for his compassionate, common sense and solution-based approach to our country’s immigration problem,” Vargas wrote in an email to Yahoo News. “The system is broken; that much, we can all agree on. But let’s start talking realistically and pragmatically about dealing with immigrants like me–who were schooled in America and have paid income taxes here in America–who are Americans in all but paper. I ask Gingrich to also visit Define American and perhaps submit a video. How does he define American? “

Gingrich reiterated his position after the debate, telling CNN in an on-camera interview that he can’t imagine any “serious person” telling someone they’ve long known that they must abandon their family, their church as “we’re kicking you out forcibly.”

And he rejected the suggestion his position opens the door to amnesty. “It’s totally inaccurate,” Gingrich replied, saying the next president must work to unify the country with similar measure. “Romney had it right when he said we favor immigration,” Gingrich said of the United States.

Other popular Yahoo! News stories:

Want more of our best political stories? Visit The Ticket or connect with us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Laura Rozen contributed to this story.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/gop/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theticket/20111122/el_yblog_theticket/newt-gingrich-prepared-to-take-the-heat-on-immigration

brain games coast to coast joakim noah iphone 4s psa jorge posada rasputin